Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev > Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC

subclipse
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC

Author markphip
Full name Mark Phippard
Date 2009-02-24 13:40:03 PST
Message Done. See attached.

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:25 PM, jcompagner <jcompagner at gmail dot com> wrote:
> yes i am currently working with 3.5 (but i thought this was also already in
> 3.4 but i can be mistaken)
>
> the first list you see is a category list. as one big list.
>
> But one fix would be to just prefix every category with Subclipse
> then it is way more clear
>
> But looking for example to Mylyn for eclipse 3.4 that shows 1 category:
> "Mylyn for Eclipse 3.4"
> and under neath 7 features where the i guess 5 are different kind of
> features you can choose and then 1 says (Recommended) and 1 says (Required)
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 22:19, Mark Phippard <markphip at gmail dot com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:16 PM, jcompagner <jcompagner at gmail dot com> wrote:
>>
>> > can you have in the site.xml just one category?
>> >
>> >  <category-def name="Subclipse" label="Subclipse">
>> >       <description>
>> >          The subclipse Subversion plugin
>> >       </description>
>> >    </category-def>
>> >
>> > and then in the feature.xml file fo the specific feature tell that it is
>> > required or optional (just like you are already doing with Mylyn)
>> >
>> > Because now in the new? Install/Update manager of eclipse it is really
>> > hard
>> > to find what belongs to subclipse (by default it is one big list of
>> > categories)
>> > Because you   have something like "intergrations" there. But you have no
>> > idea that this belongs to subclipse
>> >
>> > I think it is better to have just 1 category
>> > Or if that doesnt suite you very well prefix all the categories with
>> > subclipse so that everyting is in 1 place and you see what subclipse
>> > give
>> > us.
>>
>> You are referring to the new 3.5 installer right?  Good point, we need
>> to do something.  I wish there was an option that worked well for
>> older releases.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mark Phippard
>> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>>
>> --------------------​--------------------​--------------
>>
>> http://subclipse.tig​ris.org/ds/viewMessa​ge.do?dsForumId=1043​&dsMessageId=122​2682
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail:
>> [dev-unsubscribe@sub​clipse.tigris.org].
>
>



--
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
Attachments

« Previous message in topic | 5 of 11 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

[Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC markphip Mark Phippard 2009-02-24 10:31:31 PST
     Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC jcompagner jcompagner 2009-02-24 13:16:10 PST
         Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC markphip Mark Phippard 2009-02-24 13:19:21 PST
             Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC jcompagner jcompagner 2009-02-24 13:25:21 PST
                 Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC markphip Mark Phippard 2009-02-24 13:40:03 PST
                     Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC jcompagner jcompagner 2009-02-24 13:52:09 PST
     Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC jcompagner jcompagner 2009-02-25 03:51:03 PST
         Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC jcompagner jcompagner 2009-02-25 04:06:01 PST
     Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC jcompagner jcompagner 2009-02-25 05:10:43 PST
         Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC markphip Mark Phippard 2009-02-25 06:03:45 PST
             Re: [Subclipse-dev] Subclipse 1.6.0 release for Subversion 1.6 RC jcompagner jcompagner 2009-02-25 07:41:54 PST
Messages per page: