My pages		Projects		Community		openCollabNet

Project pages

Project tools

How do I...

Category	Featured projects
scm	Subversion, Subclipse, TortoiseSVN, RapidSVN
issuetrack	Scarab
requirements	xmlbasedsrs
design	ArgoUML
techcomm	SubEtha, eyebrowse, midgard, cowiki
construction	antelope, scons, frameworx, build-interceptor, propel, phing
testing	maxq, aut
deployment	current
process	ReadySET
libraries	GEF, Axion, Style, SSTree
Over 500 more tools...

Tigris.org (Whole-Site) Admin Contacts
Announcements mail list
Status Blog at WordPress
@tigrisdotorg on Twitter
Problem reports on the whole site
Problems and suggestions about individual projects should go to users@thatproject.tigris.org

Discussions > dev > RE: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest

subclipse
Discussion topic

There will be a brief maintenance window every Friday at 17:00 Pacific.
For further details, see CollabNet's maintenance and upgrade policy.

RE: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest

Header	Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:25:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Randy Merrill <RSMerrill at cc dot usu dot edu> Reply-To: dev <dev at subclipse dot tigris dot org> To: dev at subclipse dot tigris dot org Message-Id: <32384151.349561250285158103.JavaMail.httpd@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3d92b6630908141410o4138cc9dm4eace4de39c337e3 at mail dot gmail dot com> References: <3d92b6630908141410o4138cc9dm4eace4de39c337e3 at mail dot gmail dot com> Subject: RE: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: <dev.subclipse.tigris.org> Precedence: bulk
Author	zoramite
Full name	Randy Merrill
Date	2009-08-14 14:25:58 PDT
Message	That is what I was thinking. At this point I am thinking that the version that was used for the website is slightly more up to date. I think that making the version in the svnant portion of the repos the master and just copying over from there to the www when a new version comes out. I'll check on the the differences between the two and see how much different they are. Randy > I'm unsure about the doc generator. I don't see any reason why we > should have two DIFFERENT copies, save for the distro vs website as > you mentioned. If they could be unified and brought up to date that > would be awesome. Is that what you were thinking?

« Previous message in topic | 9 of 9 | Next message in topic »

Subject	Author	Full name	Date posted +
[Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	zoramite	Randy Merrill	2009-08-14 12:29:17 PDT
Re: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	jfrank	Joshua Frankamp	2009-08-14 13:19:17 PDT
Re: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	markphip	Mark Phippard	2009-08-14 13:21:18 PDT
Re: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	jfrank	Joshua Frankamp	2009-08-14 13:36:45 PDT
RE: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	zoramite	Randy Merrill	2009-08-14 13:41:51 PDT
Re: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	jfrank	Joshua Frankamp	2009-08-14 13:52:41 PDT
RE: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	zoramite	Randy Merrill	2009-08-14 14:03:40 PDT
Re: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	jfrank	Joshua Frankamp	2009-08-14 14:10:46 PDT
RE: [Subclipse-dev] svnant status and latest	zoramite	Randy Merrill	2009-08-14 14:25:58 PDT

Messages per page: