Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev > Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN

subclipse
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN

Author Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com>
Full name Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com>
Date 2004-11-09 06:45:27 PST
Message David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> wrote on 11/09/2004 09:40:31 AM:

> On Monday 08 November 2004 09:21, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > "Ian Brockbank" <Ian.Brockbank@wo​lfsonmicro.com> wrote on 11/08/2004
> >
> > 05:02:13 AM:
> > > - It would be nice for the commit dialog to be modeless (if Eclipse
> > > allows
> > > this). I frequently want to refer to the changes I made when
writing
> > > the
> > > commit comment.
> >
> > It seems like the Synch view might make this easier? Also, if the
commit
> > dialog contained the list of files being committed, as Tortoise does,
>
> I'd like this too. Listing the files wouldn't help at all (for me). I
want to
> be able to do a "diff" for each file to see what should be said in the
> comment.

I do not know if making the dialog modeless could cause any other
problems. For the sake of discussion, let's just say that it would cause
other problems. Couldn't you use the Create Patch option prior to the
commit, and then have the patch file open in a text editor along side the
commit dialog?

Mark


____________________​____________________​____________________​_________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
____________________​____________________​____________________​_________________

--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subc​lipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at subclipse dot tigris dot org

« Previous message in topic | 7 of 15 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-05 17:38:07 PST
     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN pkorros Panagiotis Korros 2004-11-07 11:49:15 PST
         Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-07 15:26:56 PST
             RE: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> 2004-11-08 02:02:13 PST
                 RE: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-08 06:21:55 PST
                     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-09 06:40:31 PST
                         Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-09 06:45:27 PST
                             Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-09 07:13:23 PST
                                 Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-09 07:17:34 PST
                                     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-09 07:22:45 PST
                                     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Chris Eldredge <chriseldredge at comcast dot net> Chris Eldredge <chriseldredge at comcast dot net> 2004-11-09 07:53:54 PST
                 Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN cchab chabanois cédric 2004-11-14 14:27:28 PST
         Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-08 06:18:27 PST
             Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN "Cédric Chabanois" <cchabanois at natsys dot fr> "Cédric Chabanois" <cchabanois at natsys dot fr> 2004-11-08 08:07:42 PST
                 RE: RE: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> 2004-11-09 02:36:13 PST
Messages per page: