Login | Register
My pages Projects Community openCollabNet

Discussions > dev > Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN

subclipse
Discussion topic

Back to topic list

Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN

Author David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com>
Full name David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com>
Date 2004-11-09 07:13:23 PST
Message On Tuesday 09 November 2004 09:45, Mark Phippard wrote:
> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> wrote on 11/09/2004 09:40:31 AM:
> > On Monday 08 November 2004 09:21, Mark Phippard wrote:
> > > "Ian Brockbank" <Ian.Brockbank@wo​lfsonmicro.com> wrote on 11/08/2004
> > >
> > > 05:02:13 AM:
> > > > - It would be nice for the commit dialog to be modeless (if Eclipse
> > > > allows
> > > > this). I frequently want to refer to the changes I made when
>
> writing
>
> > > > the
> > > > commit comment.
> > >
> > > It seems like the Synch view might make this easier? Also, if the
>
> commit
>
> > > dialog contained the list of files being committed, as Tortoise does,
> >
> > I'd like this too. Listing the files wouldn't help at all (for me). I
>
> want to
>
> > be able to do a "diff" for each file to see what should be said in the
> > comment.
>
> I do not know if making the dialog modeless could cause any other
> problems. For the sake of discussion, let's just say that it would cause
> other problems. Couldn't you use the Create Patch option prior to the
> commit, and then have the patch file open in a text editor along side the
> commit dialog?

Perhaps, but then If the patch is larger than then display, I still can't
scroll it. And that would be a very cumbsome process.

--------------------​--------------------​--------------------​---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subc​lipse.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help at subclipse dot tigris dot org

« Previous message in topic | 8 of 15 | Next message in topic »

Messages

Show all messages in topic

Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-05 17:38:07 PST
     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN pkorros Panagiotis Korros 2004-11-07 11:49:15 PST
         Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-07 15:26:56 PST
             RE: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> 2004-11-08 02:02:13 PST
                 RE: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-08 06:21:55 PST
                     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-09 06:40:31 PST
                         Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-09 06:45:27 PST
                             Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-09 07:13:23 PST
                                 Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-09 07:17:34 PST
                                     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> David Corbin <dcorbin at machturtle dot com> 2004-11-09 07:22:45 PST
                                     Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Chris Eldredge <chriseldredge at comcast dot net> Chris Eldredge <chriseldredge at comcast dot net> 2004-11-09 07:53:54 PST
                 Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN cchab chabanois cédric 2004-11-14 14:27:28 PST
         Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> Mark Phippard <MarkP at softlanding dot com> 2004-11-08 06:18:27 PST
             Re: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN "Cédric Chabanois" <cchabanois at natsys dot fr> "Cédric Chabanois" <cchabanois at natsys dot fr> 2004-11-08 08:07:42 PST
                 RE: RE: Getting to 1.0 - a comparison of features with TortoiseSVN Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> Ian Brockbank <Ian dot Brockbank at wolfsonmicro dot com> 2004-11-09 02:36:13 PST
Messages per page: